neville Posted February 11, 2015 #1 Share Posted February 11, 2015 Does anyone know if there is any recent documentation on the CDR output from Swyx 2015? we are seeing some disconnect reasons that are new so wanted to see if there were any other additions. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Wellige Posted February 12, 2015 #2 Share Posted February 12, 2015 The latest available documentation is for SwyxWare 2013 (http://www.swyx.com/support/ssdb.html?kbid=kb2413). What disconnect reasons do you see that are not covered there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neville Posted February 12, 2015 Author #3 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Hi Tom, the disconnect reason SubstituteNumberDenied does not appear in the 2013 documentation and comes from a 2015 CDR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Wellige Posted February 13, 2015 #4 Share Posted February 13, 2015 The caller signaled an own number that wasn't his own and therefore the address resolution within SwyxWare canceled the call. This can happen easily with wrong configured DECT handsets... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neville Posted February 13, 2015 Author #5 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Thanks Tom, but what i need to know is why Swyx is producing undocumented disconnect reasons rather than the cause of the reason. Are there any other undocumented outputs we may come across in the CDR's? Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Wellige Posted February 13, 2015 #6 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I can't tell you when this cause was added (I simply don't know) but I am sure it will be covered with the next update of the CDR specification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neville Posted February 14, 2015 Author #7 Share Posted February 14, 2015 OK Tom thanks. Do you know if there are any others not covered by the current documentation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Wellige Posted February 14, 2015 #8 Share Posted February 14, 2015 No, I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neville Posted February 15, 2015 Author #9 Share Posted February 15, 2015 OK Tom, thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.